|
AB 173 |
Dymally |
Horse racing. |
I-01/23/2003 |
|
|
01/30/2003-Referred to Com. on G.O. |
||
|
|
Existing law
prohibits any person from furnishing a tape of a quarter horse race occurring
in this state for a commercial purpose, including its use in a video game,
and from using one of these tapes, without permission from the organization
conducting the meeting, the horsemen participating in the meeting, and the
California Horse Racing Board. Existing law gives any of those persons
authority to file for an injunction against the violation of this prohibition
in superior court. This bill would expand the prohibition to cover videos as
well as tapes, and all horse races rather than merely quarter horse races. It
would also specifically prohibit the selling those tapes and videos of horse
races. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Strickland |
Horse racing: satellite wagering facilities. |
I-02/14/2003 |
|
|
02/20/2003-Referred to Com. on G.O. |
||
|
|
Existing law,
the Horse Racing Law, provides for the regulation of horse racing in this
state, by the California Horse Racing Board. This bill, while leaving intact
several authorizations for the board to permit named fairs to operate
satellite wagering facilities, would repeal the provisions authorizing the
board to permit fairs generally to operate satellite wagering facilities. The
bill would instead give the board authority, with the approval of the
Department of Food and Agriculture, to authorize any fair or racing
association to operate a satellite wagering facility, if it finds that it is
in the best interest of horse racing. Under this new authority, a satellite
facility could be located by a fair anywhere within the boundaries of the
fair's district, and by any other racing association anywhere within the
association's racing zone. However, no facility would be located under these
provisions within 20 miles of an existing satellite wagering facility or
racetrack without the consent of the existing facility or racetrack.
Conditions detailed in the existing general authorizations for the board to
permit fairs to operate satellite wagering facilities would not be explicitly
applicable to satellite wagering facilities permitted by the board under this
new authorization, although some restrictions in other provisions of the
Horse Racing law would continue to apply. This bill contains other existing
laws. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Strickland |
Horse racing: deductions. |
I-02/14/2003 |
|
|
02/20/2003-Referred to Com. on G.O. |
||
|
|
Existing law
specifies the percentages to be deducted by a racing association or fair from
the parimutuel pools for horse race wagering, and amount of these deductions
varies based on the type of bet and type of racing. This bill would permit
the California Horse Racing Board, notwithstanding these statutory
percentages, to set the deduction for any new type of wager introduced after
January 1, 2004, in an amount of not less than 10 nor more than 30% at the joint
request of the association or fair and the horsemen's organization for the
meeting of the association or fair accepting the new wager. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Horton, Jerome |
Horse racing: satellite wagering facilities. |
I-02/14/2003 |
|
|
02/20/2003-Referred to Com. on G.O. |
||
|
|
Existing law
permits the California Horse Racing Board to authorize a fair to operate a
satellite wagering facility at the fairgrounds, under certain circumstances.
Existing law permits any fair in Shasta, San Joaquin, Humboldt, or Fresno
County, with the approval of the Department of Food and Agriculture and the
authorization of the board, to operate one satellite wagering facility on
leased premises within the boundaries of that fair, subject to specified
conditions. This bill would permit a fair located in the City of Sacramento,
with the approval of the department and the authorization of the board, to
operate one satellite wagering facility within the boundaries of that fair in
addition to any facility otherwise authorized at its fairgrounds, under the
same conditions as apply in Shasta, San Joaquin, Humboldt, or Fresno County.
This bill contains other existing laws. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Horton, Jerome |
Horse racing: out-of-country thoroughbred races. |
I-02/18/2003 |
|
|
02/19/2003-From printer. May be heard in committee March 21. |
||
|
|
Existing law
provides that a thoroughbred racing association or fair may distribute the
audiovisual signal and accept wagers on the results of out-of-state and
out-of-country thoroughbred races during the calendar period the association
or fair is conducting a race meeting, provided that the total number of
thoroughbred races on which wagers are accepted statewide in any given year
does not exceed the total number of thoroughbred races on which wagers were
accepted in 1998. Existing law permits this without the consent of the
organization that represents horsemen participating in the race meeting, but
subject to other limitations, including a limitation of 23 races per day,
except as provided. State license fees on this wagering are provided for in
existing law. This bill would amend those provisions with the 23 race per day
limitation to apply only to out-of-state races in the United States. It would
add separate provisions to permit a thoroughbred racing association or fair
to distribute the audiovisual signal and accept wagers on the results of
out-of-country thoroughbred races on similar conditions, without a daily
limit on races, and subject to a different state license fee. This bill
contains other existing laws. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Yee |
Horse racing. |
I-02/18/2003 |
|
|
02/19/2003-From printer. May be heard in committee March 21. |
||
|
|
Existing law
provides that a thoroughbred racing association or fair may distribute the
audiovisual signal and accept wagers on the results of out-of-state and
out-of-country thoroughbred races during the calendar period the association
or fair is conducting a race meeting, with a specified limitation on the
total number of thoroughbred races on which wagers may be accepted statewide.
This bill would make a nonsubstantive change in those provisions. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Horton, Jerome |
Horse racing: racetrack workers welfare. |
I-02/19/2003 |
|
|
02/20/2003-From printer. May be heard in committee March 22. |
||
|
|
Existing law
for horse racing provides for the deduction of a portion of the parimutuel
pool, and provides for the allocation of the purse money and money for
commissions from this deduction. Under existing law, no horse owner's license
or license to conduct a race meeting may be issued unless the applicant's
liability for workers' compensation is secured. Existing law provides that
any termination of liability coverage results in the immediate automatic
suspension of the license during the period of that termination, and is also
a ground for revocation of the license. Existing law provides that, with
respect to a harness race meeting, a portion of the money allocated for
purses may be used to pay for obtaining, providing, or defraying the cost of
workers' compensation coverage for stable employees and drivers of licensed
standardbred trainers. This bill would require every association that
conducts a horse racing meeting to distribute an unspecified percentage of
the deduction for commissions to a collectively bargained health and welfare
trust to cover costs associated with collective healthcare and disability
benefits for designated racetrack workers. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Harman |
horse racing. |
I-02/19/2003 |
|
|
02/20/2003-From printer. May be heard in committee March 22. |
||
|
|
Existing law
generally requires every licensee conducting a horse racing meeting to
provide for the running of at least one race each racing day limited to
California-bred horses, or featuring California-bred horses, to be known as
the "California-bred race." Existing law requires for thoroughbred
and quarter horse racing that the total amount distributed to horsemen and
horsewomen for California-bred stakes races from the purse account to be not
less than 10% of the total amount distributed for all stakes races from the purse
account at that racing meeting. Existing law defines a "California-bred
quarter horse" as a quarter horse foal conceived in California by a
stallion standing in California at the time of conception. This bill would
change that definition to require the stallion to be standing in California
at the approximate time of conception. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Committee on
Governmental Organization |
Horse racing. |
I-02/19/2003 |
|
|
02/20/2003-From printer. May be heard in committee March 22. |
||
|
|
Existing law,
the Horse Racing Law, is written with a set of basic definitions near the
beginning that govern the constructions of that law. The terms
"handle," "takeout," and "advance deposit
wagering" are not defined there, and of those terms, only "advance
deposit wagering" is defined anywhere in the Horse Racing Law, and by
its terms that definition only applies to the section of law authorizing that
type of wagering. This bill would add to those definitions placed at the
beginning of the Horse Racing Law, and governing its construction,
definitions for the terms "handle," "takeout," and "advance
deposit wagering." This bill contains other related provisions and other
existing laws. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Strickland |
Horse racing: racing days and weeks. |
I-02/19/2003 |
|
|
02/20/2003-From printer. May be heard in committee March 22. |
||
|
|
Existing law
defines "racing weeks" for the purposes of the Horse Racing Law as
7 consecutive days during which a licensed racing association is authorized
by the California Horse Racing Board to conduct horse racing for a minimum of
5 racing days. Existing law permits the board to authorize a licensed racing
association or fair to conduct horse racing on a minimum of 4 racing days
during a racing week if the racing association or fair and the organization
representing horsemen jointly petition the board to do so. Existing law also
provides for fractional weeks of 4 days or less that can be authorized by the
board at the beginning or end of a racing meeting, and under certain other
circumstances. This bill would redefine "racing week" as 7
consecutive days during which an association is authorized to conduct horse
racing for a minimum of 4, instead of 5, racing days, and would authorize
less than 4 in response to a joint petition as described above. It would also
specify that fractional racing weeks of 3 days or less can be authorized by
the board on the terms now applicable to fractional racing weeks of 4 days or
less. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Wyland |
Horse racing: charity days. |
I-02/19/2003 |
|
|
02/20/2003-From printer. May be heard in committee March 22. |
||
|
|
Existing law
requires each licensed racing association to designate a certain number of
racing days to be conducted as charity days for the purpose of the
distribution of the net proceeds therefrom to beneficiaries. Existing law
also requires that beneficiaries of these proceeds be exempt or entitled to
exemption from state and federal income taxes, involved in specified
beneficial activities, and approved by the California Horse Racing Board.
Existing law requires that at least 20% of the distribution from charity day
racing go to charities associated with the horse racing industry, and
provides for other, more specific distributions for some, but not all of the
balance of this distribution. This bill would require that 20% of the
distribution from charity day racing go to a nonprofit corporation that cares
for retired race horses. It would also require the board to maintain a list
of these charities, and adopt regulations to ensure the proper expenditure of
this money. The bill would reduce the minimum amount required to go to
charities associated with the horse racing industry that are not further
specified in these provisions to 10% of the distribution. This bill contains
other related provisions. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Strickland |
Horse racing: proposition wagers. |
I-02/20/2003 |
|
|
02/21/2003-From printer. May be heard in committee March 23. |
||
|
|
For the
purpose of the Horse Racing Law, existing law defines "conventional
parimutuel pool" and "exotic parimutuel pool" and allows
conventional and exotic wagers, as defined, to be placed on all forms of
horse racing. Existing law also defines "proposition parimutuel pool"
as the total wagers under the parimutuel system on propositions approved by
the California Horse Racing Board that are based on the results of a live
quarter horse race. This bill would instead define "proposition
parimutuel pool" as the total wagers under the parimutuel system on
propositions approved by the California Horse Racing Board that are based on
the results of any live horse race, and thus would allow proposition wagers
to be made on all live horse races. This bill contains other related provisions
and other existing laws. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Committee on
Governmental Organization |
Horse racing. |
I-02/20/2003 |
|
|
02/21/2003-From printer. May be heard in committee March 23. |
||
|
|
Existing law
requires the California Horse Racing Board to make an annual report to the
Governor and the Legislature of its proceedings and the state of the business
of horse racing in the preceding fiscal year, including, among other things,
a tabulation of injuries, fatalities, and accident rates and an evaluation of
specified worker safety improvements. This bill would require the board,
prior to January 1, 2005, to prepare a study and submit a report to the
Governor and the Legislature on the current and future status of the
California horse racing industry. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Liu |
Horse racing: racing weeks. |
I-02/21/2003 |
|
|
02/24/2003-Read first time. |
||
|
|
Existing law,
the Horse Racing Law, provides for the operation of live horse racing in this
state, subject to regulation by the California Horse Racing Board. Existing
law further provides the board with the exclusive authority to allocate
racing weeks, days, and hours for horse racing, with specified maximum
numbers of racing weeks permitted in a year for racing associations that are
not fairs. This bill would permit the board to allocate one additional week
of thoroughbred racing to a racing association that is not a fair in the
central zone, which shall be used by the racing association during a period
when a fair is also conducting live racing in the central zone. This bill
contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Levine |
Horse racing: racetrack workers welfare. |
I-02/21/2003 |
|
|
02/24/2003-Read first time. |
||
|
|
Existing law
for horse racing provides for the deduction of a portion of the parimutuel
pool, and provides for the allocation of the purse money and money for
commissions from this deduction. Under existing law, no horse owner's license
or license to conduct a race meeting may be issued unless the applicant's
liability for workers' compensation is secured. Existing law provides that any
termination of liability coverage results in the immediate automatic
suspension of the license during the period of that termination, and is also
a ground for revocation of the license. Existing law provides that, with
respect to a harness race meeting, a portion of the money allocated for
purses may be used to pay for obtaining, providing, or defraying the cost of
workers' compensation coverage for stable employees and drivers of licensed
standardbred trainers. This bill would require every association that
conducts a horse racing meeting to distribute an unspecified percentage of
the deduction for commissions to one or both of 2 specific types of entities
to cover costs associated with collective healthcare and disability benefits
for designated racetrack workers. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
McLeod,
Negrete |
Horse racing: racing days. |
I-02/21/2003 |
|
|
02/24/2003-Read first time. |
||
|
|
Existing law
provides that the jurisdiction and supervision over meetings in this state
where horse races with wagering on their results are held or conducted, and
over all persons or things having to do with the operation of such meetings,
is vested in the California Horse Racing Board. This jurisdiction includes
the authority to allocate racing days and weeks to racing associations and
fairs, as provided. Existing law permits the board to allocate up to 14
racing days to a fair each year, with specified exceptions, and provides that
these 14 days shall be during the period in which general fair activities are
conducted. This bill would permit, rather than require, the 14 days to be
during the period in which general fair activities are conducted. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Soto |
Horse racing: racing days and weeks. |
I-02/06/2003 |
|
|
02/12/2003-To Com. on RLS. |
||
|
|
Existing law,
the Horse Racing Law, provides for the operation of live horse racing in this
state, subject to regulation by the California Horse Racing Board. Existing
law further provides the board with the exclusive authority to allocate racing
days, dates, and hours for horse racing, as specified. This bill would make
technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. This bill contains
other existing laws. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Ashburn |
Horse racing. |
I-02/21/2003 |
|
|
02/24/2003-Read first time. |
||
|
|
Existing law
authorizes the Horse Racing Board to permit fairs to operate satellite
wagering facilities at their fairgrounds, under certain conditions. In
addition, existing law permits any fair in San Joaquin, Humboldt, Fresno, or
Shasta County, with the approval of the Department of Food and Agriculture
and the authorization of the board, to operate one satellite wagering
facility within the boundaries of the fair, as specified. Existing law
permits any fair in Kern County to operate a satellite wagering facility at
its fairgrounds under specified circumstances. This bill would permit any
fair in Kern County, with the approval of the Department of Food and
Agriculture and the authorization of the board, to operate one satellite
wagering facility within the boundaries of the fair, on the same conditions
as apply in Shasta County. This bill contains other existing laws. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Karnette |
Horse racing: California-bred horses. |
I-02/21/2003 |
|
|
02/24/2003-Read first time. |
||
|
|
Existing law
provides for special races for California-bred horses, with minimum purse
money allocated to those races. Existing law also establishes a California
Standardbred Sires Stakes Program to promote the breeding of standardbred
horses in the state that includes special stakes races for these horses.
Existing law defines a "California-bred standardbred horse" for
these purposes as a standardbred foal dropped by a mare in California after
being conceived in California and remaining in California until the foal is
weaned, or any standardbred foal which is conceived in California on or after
January 1, 1984. This bill would redefine a California-bred standardbred
horse as a standardbred foal dropped by a mare in California after being
conceived in California by a stallion registered with the California
Standardbred Sires Stakes Program. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Vincent |
Horse racing: distribution of audiovisual signals. |
I-02/21/2003 |
|
|
02/24/2003-Read first time. |
||
|
|
Existing law
provides that, during the calendar period of its racing meeting, a
thoroughbred racing association or fair may distribute the audiovisual signal
and accept wagers on out-of-state and out-of-country thoroughbred races,
provided that the total number of races imported statewide in any given year
does not exceed the total number of races imported in 1998. This bill would
specify that a fair can also execute an agreement to allow another
association in the southern zone to distribute the signal and accept wagers
on these races. This bill contains other existing laws. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Vincent |
Horse racing. |
I-02/21/2003 |
|
|
02/24/2003-Read first time. |
||
|
|
Under
existing law, the board may authorize an association or fair licensed to
conduct a racing meeting to operate a satellite wagering facility for
wagering on races conducted at its racetrack inclosure, subject to specified
conditions, including the execution of an agreement approved by the board. Existing
law requires this agreement to include certain terms, and requires other
aspects of the satellite facility to receive board approval. In addition,
existing law requires the horsemen's organization that represents the
horsemen at the association that conducts the racing meeting on which wagers
are to be accepted to agree to the arrangement if it is to take effect,
except as specified. This bill would make a nonsubstantive change in these
provisions. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Margett |
Horse racing. |
I-02/21/2003 |
|
|
02/24/2003-Read first time. |
||
|
|
Existing law
requires the California Horse Racing Board to adopt regulations to establish
standards governing the employee housing provided to backstretch personnel at
licensed racetracks. Existing law provides that no license shall be issued to
a racing association to conduct a horse race meeting unless the board has inspected
the housing conditions that exist on the racetrack's backstretch and
determined the living conditions to be in compliance with the standards
established by the board. This bill would make a nonsubstantive change to
those provisions. |
||
|
|
Click here
for Bill text, analysis, votes, etc.
Leginfo Link |
||
|
|
|
||